翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Rubber Soul
・ Rubber Soul (disambiguation)
・ Rubber Soul Project
・ Rubber Souldiers
・ Rubber stamp
・ Rubber stamp (politics)
・ Rubber tapping
・ Rubber technology
・ Rubber Tires
・ Rubber toughening
・ Rubber Trade Association of Penang
・ Rubber tyred gantry crane
・ Rubber washer
・ Rubber's Lover
・ Rubber-hose cryptanalysis
Rubber-Tip Pencil Co. v. Howard
・ Rubber-tyred metro
・ RubberBand
・ Rubberband (album)
・ Rubberband Banks
・ Rubberband Girl
・ Rubberbullet
・ Rubberduck
・ Rubberen Robbie
・ Rubberface
・ Rubberhose (file system)
・ Rubberized asphalt
・ Rubberlegs Williams
・ Rubbermaid
・ Rubbermaid (comics)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Rubber-Tip Pencil Co. v. Howard : ウィキペディア英語版
Rubber-Tip Pencil Co. v. Howard
''Rubber-Tip Pencil Co. v. Howard''〔(''Rubber-Tip Pencil Company v. Howard'' ), 87 U.S. 498 (1874).〕 is an 1874 decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the patent eligibility of abstract ideas. As explained below in the ''Subsequent developments'' section, it is intermediate in the development of that aspect of patent law from ''Neilson v Harford'',〔151 Eng. Rep. 1266, 8 M. & W. 806, Web. Pat. Cases 295 (1841).〕 through ''O’Reilly v. Morse'',〔56 U.S. (15 How.) 62 (1853).〕 to ''Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.'',〔333 U.S. 127 (1948).〕 and then to ''Parker v. Flook'',〔437 U.S. 584 (1978).〕 ''Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc.'',〔566 U.S. __, 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012).〕 and ''Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l''.〔573 U.S. __, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014).〕
The ''Rubber-Tip Pencil'' case has frequently been cited in the subsequent Supreme Court decisions concerning the patent eligibility of computer-related claimed inventions, such as ''Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank'',〔134 S. Ct. 2347, 2355 (2014) ("an idea of itself is not patentable").〕 ''Diamond v. Diehr'',〔450 U.S. 175, 185 (1981) (same).〕 ''Parker v. Flook'',〔437 U.S. 584 598 (1978) (dissenting opinion) ("laws of nature, physical phenomena, and abstract ideas are not patentable subject matter").〕 and ''Gottschalk v. Benson'',〔409 U.S. 63, 67 (1972) (same). See also ''In re Comiskey'', 554 F.3d 967, 978 (Fed. Cir. 2009); ''In re Warmerdam'', 33 F.3d 1354, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1994).〕
==Background==

Lead pencils and rubber erasers were known for a long time.〔The Greeks and Romans used a sharpened lump of lead or a lead stylus to make gray marks on papyrus, about 200 years ago. Karl S. Kruszelnicki, (''Lead in your pencil'' ), ABC (Sept. 9, 2004). In the mid-1500s a deposit of high-grade graphite was discovered, was mistakenly thought to be black lead, and was utilized for writing on paper. Daven Hiskey, , 20 Fed. Cas. 1298, Case No. 12,102, 1872 U.S. App. LEXIS 1450 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1872).〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Rubber-Tip Pencil Co. v. Howard」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.